Ultimate Comparison: Flexo vs Rotogravure (Gravure) Printing

Flexo = Cheaper, faster setup, more flexible substrates.
Rotogravure = Superior quality, expensive tooling, best for high-volume premium packaging.

Flexographic printing machine (Flexo) and Rotogravure (Gravure) printing are the two dominant technologies in packaging and converting.

Here is the full side-by-side comparison covering print quality, cost, inks, speeds, substrates, applications, maintenance, and decision guidance.

1. Core Printing Technology

Flexo

  • Flexible photopolymer plate
  • Image is raised
  • Ink transferred via anilox roller → plate → substrate

Rotogravure

  • Engraved metal cylinder
  • Image is recessed (cells)
  • Ink pulled from cells → substrate through pressure

2. Print Quality Comparison

ParameterFlexoRotogravure
Fine detailsGoodExcellent
Gradients & halftonesVery good with HD platesSuperior / photographic
Ink densityModerateHigh, rich, deep
ConsistencyGoodExceptional for long runs
Dot gainPresentMinimal

Winner: Rotogravure for premium packaging films.


3. Speed & Production Efficiency

  • Flexo: 350–550 m/min
  • Rotogravure: 600–800+ m/min

Winner: Rotogravure (best for continuous mass production)


4. Cost & Setup

Flexo

  • Low plate cost
  • Cheaper for short/medium runs
  • Quick job changeovers

Rotogravure

  • High cylinder engraving cost
  • Best ROI only for large volumes
  • Longer setup time

Winner: Flexo (short runs) / Rotogravure (long runs)


5. Substrate Compatibility

Substrate TypeFlexoGravure
Paper✔ Excellent✔ Good
Corrugated✔ Best choice✖ Not suitable
Films (PET/BOPP/CPP)✔ Good✔ Excellent
Foil✔ Good✔ Excellent
Kraft✔ Excellent✖ Limited
Labels✔ Best✔ Good

Winner: Flexo = More versatile
Gravure = Best for premium films


6. Ink Systems

Flexo

  • Water-based
  • UV-curable
  • Solvent-based
  • Eco-friendly & low VOC options

Rotogravure

  • Mostly solvent-based
  • High evaporation rate
  • Excellent for metallic/speciality inks

Winner: Flexo for environmental compliance
Gravure for specialized high-density inks


7. Image Reproduction

FeatureFlexoGravure
Photographic imagesGoodExcellent
Metallic colorsGoodExcellent
Large solid areasVery goodExceptional
Fine textGoodExcellent
Color consistencyGoodNear-perfect

Winner: Rotogravure


8. Operational & Maintenance Factors

Flexo

  • Easy cleaning
  • Lower maintenance cost
  • Plates wear faster over time

Gravure

  • Cylinders last extremely long
  • Harder to clean
  • Higher maintenance requirements

9. Best Applications

Flexo Works Best For

  • Labels & stickers
  • Paper bags
  • Tissue & hygiene products
  • Corrugated packaging
  • Medium-run flexible packaging
  • Short-run promotions

Rotogravure Works Best For

  • High-volume flexible packaging
  • FMCG snacks & confectionery
  • Premium laminate films
  • Pharmaceutical packaging
  • Large-area image printing
  • Consistent million-meter runs

10. Decision Matrix (Fast Guide for Buyers)

If You Need…Choose FlexoChoose Rotogravure
Lower startup cost
Short-run jobs
Fast changeovers
Eco-friendly inks
Premium print quality
Photographic detail
High-volume printing
Consistent color across millions of meters

11. Summary Table

CategoryFlexographic (Flexo) PrintingRotogravure (Gravure) Printing
Printing MethodRaised polymer platesRecessed engraved cylinders
QualityHighSuperior
Detail & HalftonesVery goodBest in industry
Ink TypeWater, UV, SolventMostly solvent
Environmental ImpactLowerHigher
Tooling CostLowHigh
Setup TimeFastSlow
Ideal Run LengthShort–MediumLong–Very Long
SpeedHighVery High
Substrate RangeWideModerate
Substrate StrengthBest for paper/corrugatedBest for films/foils
Color ConsistencyGoodExcellent
MaintenanceLowHigh
ApplicationLabels, paper, corrugatedFlexible films, FMCG packaging


    Your Name*

    Mobile Number*

    Address*

    Email*

    Your Technical Inquiry

    captcha